Skip to main contentSkip to footer
Why is Christian Science in our name?
Why is Christian Science in our name?
Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The Christian Science Church, and we’ve always been transparent about that.
The Church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.
Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.
Explore values journalismAbout us
Log inLog out
Log inSubscribeGive a gift
of stories this month>Get unlimited stories
Your subscription makes our work possible.
We want to bridge divides to reach everyone.
Subscribe
Deepen your worldview
with Monitor Highlights.
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads.
Select free newsletters:
');});$( document ).ready( function(){ removeMultipleListings();triggerNewsletterModal(); try { let salesforce_id = _satellite.getVar('Query String - SFMC Subscriber ID'); if ( salesforce_id ) { let pagePath = csmJs.pageData.sections; if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Books' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'books' ); } else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Politics' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'politics' ); } else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Education' ) > -1 || pagePath.indexOf( 'The Culture' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'culture-learning' ); } else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Science' ) > -1 || pagePath.indexOf( 'Environment' ) > -1 || pagePath.indexOf( 'Technology' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'science' ); } else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'A Christian Science Perspective' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'csperspective' ); } else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Commentary' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'commentary' ); } else { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'highlights' ); } } } catch ( error ) { console.warn( error ); }});
In a Word
What's in a phrase? How "pulling yourself up by your bootstraps"went from describingan absurd, impossible featto an American ideal.
|
Staff
Loading...
By Melissa MohrCorrespondent
Afunctional accessory looms large in the American cultural imagination: the bootstrap. Pulling oneself up by one’s bootstraps involves the idea that a person can succeed “without help from other people, as a result of one’s own hard work,” as Merriam-Webster defines it.
It is ironic that this metaphor is so widely used to represent the American dream of social and economic mobility through self-reliance, since the action required is physically impossible. When it was first used in the 19th century, the saying made more sense – it described an absurd, impossible feat.
How didbootstrap-pulling go from a ridiculous idea to an American ideal?
Bootstraps are handles or a ribbon attached to the top of a boot to help the wearer pull it on. Linguist Ben Zimmer has traced the idiom back to an 1834 newspaper, in which one Mr. Murphee is satirically described as being “enabled to hand himself over the Cumberland river or a barn yard fence by the straps of his boots.” It appears throughout the 19th century, often in the company of other colorful metaphors for ludicrous impossibilities, such as “sitting in a wheelbarrow and trying to wheel yourself” and “getting rich by taking money from one pocket and putting it in another.”
In the early 20th century, hyperbolic newspapers declared that some people were indeed able to do the impossible and raise themselves by bootstraps alone. A 1908 journal asserted, “No one ever succeeded in elevating himself into prominence by pulling on his own bootstraps as successfully as ...” well, it’s William Randolph Hearst, who isn’t a great example. But less-privileged people could do it, too, though it was difficult – a journalist wrote in 1918 that “the ability of the worker to pull himself up by his own bootstraps” is “a miracle.”
By the mid-20th century, bootstrapping had become part of our national narrative, seen not as a miracle but as the almost inevitable result of hard work. Today, the idiom is caught up in political partisanship: Liberals tend to distrust the idea while conservatives celebrate it.
There is one sphere in which bootstrapping operates without partisanship – computer science. In the 1960s, engineers used what they called a bootstrap loader to get software onto a computer. A person would toggle switches on the machine to enter a simple program. This loader would be able to read a more complex program, which would read an even more complex one, and so on. As The New Hacker’s Dictionary sums up, “Thus, in successive steps, the computer ‘pulled itself up by the bootstraps’ to a useful operating state.”
Today, though the days of toggling switches are gone, we still refer to starting a computer as booting it up.
You've readoffree articles.Subscribe to continue.
Help fund Monitor journalism for $11/ month
Already a subscriber? Login
Mark Sappenfield
Editor
Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations.
Our work isn't possible without your support.
Subscribe
Unlimited digital access $11/month.
Already a subscriber? Login
Digital subscription includes:
- Unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.
- CSMonitor.com archive.
- The Monitor Daily email.
- No advertising.
- Cancel anytime.
Subscribe
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
Mark Sappenfield, Editor
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Related stories
In a WordThe explosive origin of ‘hoist by one’s own petard’
In a WordExplaining the ‘royal order’ of adjective placement
In a WordCurbing our use of the ‘fundamentalist’ label
Mark Sappenfield
Editor
Dear Reader,
About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:
“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”
If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.
But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.
The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.
We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”
If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.
Subscribe to insightful journalism
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/In-a-Word/2021/1004/How-the-bootstrap-idiom-became-a-cultural-ideal
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe
Deepen your worldview
with Monitor Highlights.
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads.
Select free newsletters:
');});$( document ).ready( function(){ removeMultipleListings();triggerNewsletterModal(); try { let salesforce_id = _satellite.getVar('Query String - SFMC Subscriber ID'); if ( salesforce_id ) { let pagePath = csmJs.pageData.sections; if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Books' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'books' ); } else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Politics' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'politics' ); } else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Education' ) > -1 || pagePath.indexOf( 'The Culture' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'culture-learning' ); } else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Science' ) > -1 || pagePath.indexOf( 'Environment' ) > -1 || pagePath.indexOf( 'Technology' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'science' ); } else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'A Christian Science Perspective' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'csperspective' ); } else if ( pagePath.indexOf( 'Commentary' ) > -1 ) { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'commentary' ); } else { csmJs.cta.changeBanner( 'highlights' ); } } } catch ( error ) { console.warn( error ); }});
Subscription expired
Your subscription toThe Christian Science Monitor has expired.Youcan renew your subscription orcontinue to use the site without asubscription.
If you have questions about your account, pleasecontact customer serviceor call us at 1-617-450-2300.
This message will appear once per weekunless you renew orlog out.
Session expired
Your session to The ChristianScience Monitor has expired. Welogged you out.
Log in again
If you have questions about your account, pleasecontact customer serviceor call us at 1-617-450-2300.
No subscription
You don’t have a Christian Science Monitorsubscription yet.
Subscribe now
If you have questions about your account, pleasecontact customer serviceor call us at 1-617-450-2300.